Free shipping on orders over $95Buy one with 1% offer on sale price
Zoom the image with the mouse
Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:: An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy
ISBN:
9789048147540
List Price:
$219.99
Share:
Special Offers Available
Free shipping on orders over $95Buy one with 1% offer on sale priceBuy New
We can help you leverage the power of books
Customer Service
Connect with a dedicated account manager who is there every step of the way.
Price Match Guarantee
If you see better pricing elsewhere on your desired quantity, we will price match so you can be sure to get the best pricing.
Free Shipping
Enjoy free ground shipping on your order of $95 or more!
Brand New Guarantee
We only sell books that are brand new and protect that with a guarantee.
Customization
From author signatures to marketing inserts, custom packaging to brand stickers, we can help take your book marketing to the next level.
Details
R. G. Collingwood saw one of the main tasks of philosophers and of historians of human thought in uncovering what he called the ultimate presuppositions of different thinkers, of different philosophical movements and of entire eras of intellectual history. He also noted that such ultimate presuppositions usually remain tacit at first, and are discovered only by subsequent reflection. Collingwood would have been delighted by the contrast that constitutes the overall theme of the essays collected in this volume. Not only has this dichotomy ofviews been one ofthe mostcrucial watersheds in the entire twentieth-century philosophical thought. Not only has it remained largely implicit in the writings of the philosophers for whom it mattered most. It is a truly Collingwoodian presupposition also in that it is not apremise assumed by different thinkers in their argumentation. It is the presupposition of a question, an assumption to the effect that a certain general question can be raised and answered. Its role is not belied by the fact that several philosophers who answered it one way or the other seem to be largely unaware that the other answer also makes sense - if it does. This Collingwoodian question can be formulated in a first rough approximation by asking whether language - our actual working language, Tarski's "colloquiallanguage" - is universal in the sense of being inescapable. This formulation needs all sorts of explanations, however.
Product details
Need Books? Bookpal makes it easy
Connect With Us
Customer Reviews
Products related to this item
Related Products